![]() I would say if you are usually working with small files without much need for retraction, CURA is very nice. CURA was also alot easier to get working well quickly from a standing start. On the flipside, the STL file position and rotation manipulation is much better in CURA, as are the variety of settings for infill and support. Which is not something that can be said for CURA unfortunatley. ![]() Thirdly KISSLICER can handle really big STL files without falling over. The very latest NETFABB and CURA versions. Secondly the retraction results are far superior to those obtainable from anything else, although I have not tried KISSCLICER can do the same file in under 5minuites. There are three reasons I like KISSLICER, first is that for the typical CAD models I use most other slicers You need to do is to paste these 3 files into the home directory of Kisslicer and it will use those settings. On the google Ultimaker group that at least two people have posted their 3 config files for Kisslicer. I found KISSLICER to be really a pain to set up for the ultimaker when I was used to CURA, but I found Make it heat up and start where ever you like in XYZ space.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |